An Animal Model Of Adolescent Harsh Physical Abuse

AN ANIMAL MODEL OF HARSH PHYSICAL ABUSE
​Introduction

Progress imaging human brain structure and function has been extensive over the past 3 decades. Methods to show brain atrophy and hypertrophy are available. Correlations and complex mathematical models can be devised that relate disease symptoms with functional brain changes. Also, many regions are almost always engaged in a single function that are termed networks. Each node in the network has a unique contribution to a particular function(s) and cingulate cortex is one such node in many networks because it is engaged in many functions.

As shown in previous sections, ACC and MCC express structural and functional damage in disorders like PTSD and depression in patients with histories of child abuse (Kitayama et al., 2006; Tottenham et al., 2010; Wooodward et al., 2005; Shin et al., 2004, 2009). Child abuse itself reduces ACC volume (Cohen et al., 2006; Mangilo, 2010; Breslow et al., 2006; Dannlowski et al., 2012; Ansell et al., 2012). PTSD patients also have high levels of diffuse pain and child harsh abuse/rape affects them into adulthood.

There are, however, drawbacks to studying brain changes evoked by human child abuse and rape. The biggest problem is heterogeneity; i.e., all children/adolescents have different genetic makeups, find themselves in different contexts during the abuse, the abuse can occur at different times of their life, the relationship of the abuse to evoked symptoms (fear, anxiety, stress, pain) can be quite complex in the brain and evolves over time into different disease states as discussed in “Adult-onset Psychopathologies.” Indeed, children do not become aware of their abuse often for decades after the experiences and their reports often only become useful in late adolescence (ages 20-25 and beyond). Thus, there are so many unknowns when working with abused children, it is almost impossible to determine cause and effect in terms of their experiences much less to access their brains for biochemical and neuropathological analyses.

This brings us to the issue of using animal models. Animal models are one of the workhorses of biomedical research. For example, gene editing is a promising cure for HIV/AIDS by removing the HIV-1 proviral DNA. This is being done in mice (Yin et al., 2017) but much of the early work with HIV-AIDS was done with Simian viruses in non-human primates. In terms of our work, all mammals can be abused. However, no neuroscientist thinks that an animal experiences the same perceptions of abuse as humans. However, animals are required for 4 reasons. First, the same genetic strain can be used such that genetic differences play a minor role in variability of responses to abuse. Second, the onset, duration, and characteristics of the physical abuse can be standardized, while in humans most of these factors can only be estimated. Third, although animals cannot tell us about their internal feelings, they can be tested behaviorally and provide a window into their world of abuse. Fourth, the brains can be removed to explore protein and neuron changes that occur during and after the abusive events. This is a critical issue as it will lead eventually to identifying what networks (connected nodes) are involved and how to fix them soon after the abusive events.

Thus, animals provide a standardized approach to abuse, brain changes and possible treatments to block adult-onset psychopathology. The goal of such work is to devise effective rational, brain-based strategies that have not emerged from human imaging studies.

As we use rabbits, it is important to identify similarities and differences in cingulate cortex between the two species as shown in the adjacent figure. The 4 colors are for the four cingulate regions (ACC, MCC, PCC, retrosplenial cortex, RSC). These are further divided into subregions (subgenual ACC, pregenual ACC, anterior MCC, posterior MCC, dorsal PCC, ventral PCC, anterior and posterior RSC, not shown). Finally, each subregion is comprised of numerous areas that are described in many articles in the CNSI Library. Similarities between the two species are emphasized with arrows.

The first attempt to model child abuse was published by Vogt, Vogt and Sikes (2018; #66 in the Library). The abuse was noxious balloon distension of colorectal tissue (nCRD), 3X/week for 3 weeks. Some neuroscientists incorrectly assumed this is a form of chronic visceral pain and this is not the case as addressed in the Discussion of the above cited article. In fact, it is a nociceptive-stress model; i.e., short (21 min), frequent (3X/week for 3 weeks) bouts of pain evoked stress to model the human condition of harsh physical abuse. The behavioral task of contextual fear showed that some animals were vulnerable to the abuse and others were not (resilient). The study focused on ACC/MCC for reasons discussed in human research. Finally, the largest portion of this article reports neuronal responses to noxious stimulation and was not written for the layperson who will be more engaged by the Introduction, first part of the Methods that describe the model, first part of the Results that describe behavioral results and the Discussion.

Animal studies show that ACC is critical for contextual fear memory as nCRD evokes conditioned place avoidance mediated by ACC (Johanson et al., 2001; Yan et al., 2012) and is activated by remote contextual fear (Figueirdo et al., 2003). Some animals in our model were vulnerable as shown in a contextual fear task (withheld moving) and some resilient (jumped right into the testing area). There was no sign of ongoing abdominal pain in these animals. We demonstrated that many changes occur in ACC and aMCC.

The nociceptive (pain)-stress conditioning of our rabbits is a model of harsh physical abuse and this is our starting point for future studies. With it we will be able to explore the entire brain for changes in proteins and neuron and dendrite atrophy or death. We will be able to follow brain changes over time into adulthood and hope that rational treatments will result that will block such changes including adult-onset psychopathologies.

We are in need of your support to implement these next generation studies; particularly from the survivor community that understands the short- and long-term consequences of child abuse.

References

Ansell EB, Rando K, Tuit K, Guarnaccia J, Sinha R (2012) Cumulative adversity and smaller gray matter volume in medial prefrontal, anterior cingulate, & insula regions. Biol Psychiatry 72:57-64.

Breslau N, Davis GC, Andreski P, Peterson EL, Schultz LR (1997) Sex differences in posttraumatic stress disorder. Arch Gen Psychiatry 54:1044-1048.

Cohen RA, Grieve S, Hoth KF, Paul RH, Sweet L, et al. (2006) Early life stress and morphometry of the adult anterior cingulate cortex and caudate nuclei. Biolog Psychiatry 59:975-982.

Dannlowski U, Stuhrmann A, Beutelmann V, et al. (2012) Limbic scars: Long-term consequences of childhood maltreatment revealed by functional and structural magnetic resonance imaging. Biol Psychiatry 71:286-293.

Figueirdo HF, Bruestle A, Bodie B, Dolgas CM, Herman JP (2003) The medial prefrontal cortex differentially regulates stress-induced c-fos expression in the forebrain depending on type of stressor. J Neurosci 18:2357-2364.

Johansen JP, Fields HL, Manning BH (2001) The affective component of pain in rodents: Direct evidence for a contribution of the anterior cingulate cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci  98:8077–8082.

Kitayama N, Quinn S, Bremner JD (2006) Smaller volume of anterior cingulate cortex in abuse-related posttraumatic stress disorder. J Affec Disor 90(2-3):171-174.

Maniglio R (2010) Child sexual abuse in the etiology of depression: A systematic review of reviews. Depr Anx 27:631-642.

Shin LM, Orr SP, Carson MA, Rauch SL, Macklin ML, et al. (2004) Regional cerebral blood flow in the amygdala and medial prefrontal cortex during traumatic imagery in male and female Vietnam veterans with PTSD. Arch Gen Psychiatry 61:168-176.

Shin LM, Whalen PJ, Pitman RK, Rauch SL (2009) The role of the anterior cingulate cortex in posttraumatic stress and panic disorders. In: BA Vogt (ed), Cingulate Neurobiology and Disease, Oxford University Press: Oxford, pp. 453-465.

Tottenham N, Hare TA, Quinn BT et al. (2010) Prolonged institutional rearing is associated with atypically large amygdala volume and difficulties in emotion regulation. Develop Sci 13(1):46–61.

Vogt BA, Vogt LJ, Sikes RW (2017) A nociceptive stress model of adolescent physical abuse induces contextual fear and cingulate nociceptive neuroplasticities. Brain Struc Func (doi: 10.1007/s00429-017-1502-3).

Woodward SH, Kaloupek DG, Streeter CC, Martomez C, Schaer M, Eliez S (2005) Decreased anterior cingulate volume in combat-related PTSD. Biol Psychiatry 59:582-587.

Yan N, Cao B, Xu J, Hao C, Zhang X, Li Y (2012) Glutamatergic activation of anterior cingulate cortex mediates the affective component of visceral pain memory in rats. Neurobiol Learn Mem 97:156–164.

Yin C, Zhang T, Qu X, Zhang Y, Putatunda R, Xiao X, Li F et al. (2017) In vivo excision of HIV-1 provirus by saCas9 and multiplex single-guide RNAs in animal models. Mol Ther 25(5)1158-1186.